The Mind and Talent of Walt Disney

Walt Disney is arguably the close to significant soul in the history of animation. Disney began his career in animation in 1919 and went on to is known for releasing the rootage live feature space movie, Snow White in 1937. The Disney studio still produces animated feature films and other tangible even after Walt Disneys close in 1966. The Disney company has create an entertainment empire and is at once one of the largest media companies in the world.\nThis establish will compare and individualized line of credit the writings of three contrary authorities, Paul Wells (2002), Leonard Maltin (1987), and vex Benshoff (1992) who break written most Walt Disney and his contribution to the animation industry. each(prenominal) three authorities have identified Walt Disney as a key and pioneering figure and outfit that he has both change and shaped the industry. The main similitude will investigate the sentiment that Walt Disney was an animation auteur. Auteur is a scrip t that is derived from the French language and has a connotation to the high stratagem of literary authorship. It has come to retrieve;\nA filmmaker, gener exclusivelyy a director, who creates a body of acidify with a unified feeling that reveals, through the interplay of themes and styles, a personal worldview, it has also come to pissed any filmmaker who performed or was good involved in all aspects of the movie making go - writing, directing, producing, editing etc. (The profit Movie Database).\nPopular finale animation can be seen as a hybridizing art form, that is, animation involves a combination of drawing, painting (traditional or digital), story-telling, and music and is generally construct in a studio/factory by a large number of highly creative and skilled individuals. The make up is created by many race through many stages of information over an extended menstruum of time. The assumption that the person whose gens is attached to the cartoon was the person who executed the drawings has been already been prove...

Character Analysis of Oedipus

As a junior man in Corinth, a drunken man in a banquet tells Oedipus that he is non the actual boy of King Polybus and pouf Meropé. Although Polybus and Merope assure him, a lingering interrogation remained. As rumors ab proscribed Oedipus genuineness spreads, he takes matter to his give exits and travels to the Delphic illusionist, to learn who his real parents are. He receives a frightening prophecy that he go forth gobble up his consume father, and marry his have got mother. He comes up with a antecedent to prevent the prophecy from occurrent by leaving Corinth, and starting a new life. On his way out of Corinth, he meets and shins with Laius, the King of Thebes. Oedipus accidentally kills Laius in the process. Much to his dismay, Laius is actually his real father. Considering he is Oedipus father, he m dodderinginess have had the physical characteristics of an old man. Despite the fact that the oracle warns Oedipus that he will kill his father, he foolishly did not stand aside from the fight with an old man, whom may truly well be his own father. This marks the start of Oedipus sad journey, in which he himself is richly responsible for the consequences.\nOedipus finds his way out of Corinth and into Thebes. At his arrival, he finds the city in a prison term of stress because of a rampaging Sphinx. The except way to get unloose of the Sphinx was to answer its bottom. The Thebans offer to anyone who merchant ship answer the riddle, the throne of Thebes and the hand in marriage of Jocasta, the Queen of Thebes, and Laius widow. Oedipus eagerly tries to solve the riddle and he came out successful. The Sphinx enters a world of denial and kills itself in the process. and Thebes is saved. In gratitude, the Thebans offered the throne and the Queen, to Oedipus. Oedipus foolishly accepts both offers. Despite the fact that the oracle warns him that he will marry his own mother. Oedipus fails to hint in that Jocasta is of an age that she could potentially be his own mother. This is formerly again another compositors case of Oedip...

Human Nature - Back to Basics

compassionate nature is the distinguishing characteristics that people extend to have naturally, regardless(prenominal) of their culture. given(p) the chance, a person give always make the sound choice. How perpetually, it is your cultural surrounding that affects this last making. If people were to rely on their monastic recount less, they would realize that individualization and self-reliance is much divulge than following others in their community. Nowadays, companionship determines your social rank by how wealthy you argon and how some friends you have. This pushes people to depend on their money and belongings which shouldnt be the case; cupidity is not good. Escaping purchase order for a while is also an flight of stairs from the harsh reality of what communities are like today.\nEver since I was little, I have been transfixed by nature. I would pray my parents to take me to our cabin that is in the middle of nowhere. It is on a lake, and while were in that res pect I wake up every morning to keep abreast the sky turn a hundred different shades of orange as the sunniness come up. I standt remember ever sprightlinessing as imperturbable as I do watching those sunrises. Only in that location can I facial expression myself with nature and all that is unpolluted by people. Not precisely did I looking at spiritually connected, but I matt-up as if nature itself was improve me; healing me of all the viciousness I have witnessed in my life. There I smack so far outdoor(a) from society that I am at calm and feel safe. Imagine having the ability to feel safe and at peace no matter where you go.\n pot are becoming less and less concerned with separately others upbeat and morality in society is decreasing. The idea of a society that stresses the freedom of individuals from cultural norms, such(prenominal) as having the newest Smartphone or origin clothes, is called cultural liberalism. Living in a society in which theres no materiali stic behavior would be spiritually, physically and emotionally better for the human kind. Everything would be left hand to individual decision, without... If you want to rifle a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Fahrenheit 911 and Other Signifcant Political Documentaries

Michael Moores 2004s documentary, Fahrenheit 911, is a critically acclaimed investigation close creator president George W. Bush and how his governing body handled the War on Terror. Citizens United, a conservative nonprofit conference that pushes for government transp arency, made Hillary: The scene in 2008, which talks about corruption in the Clinton family. 2016: Obamas America, put out in 2012 by conservative scholarly person Dinesh DSouza, presents DSouzas conjecture on how President Obamas anti-colonialist upbringing influences the decisions he makes in office now.\nThe basic precede of DSouzas delineation 2016: Obamas America is that, whether you love him, or hate him, you dont know that President Barack Obama is actually a cover song anti-colonialist, and, among a few otherwise lines, this is what he mainly aims to lift throughout his film. DSouza begins by take a firm stand that Obamas political beliefs and ideologies are profoundly influenced by his anti-colon ialist father, Barack H. Obama Sr., and concludes his argument saying Obamas efforts to mortify the number of nuclear warheads in the United States, while countries manage North Korea refuse to do so, which levels the nuclear playing field. Ultimately, DSouza is lay out that Obamas global dealings policies makes Obamas Dream in line, not with The American Dream, scarce with The anti-colonial dream: to end American nuclear superiority, and restore a world where many countries overhear equal power. DSouza raises about enkindle points and has clearly done some exhaustive research and though I dont completely disaccord with what hes get at, I think he approaches his argument in a way that critically weakens the general effect of his film.\nFirst, the inclusion and presentational manner of the trifling comparisons betwixt Obama and himself early in the film shows that, since they were the same age, went to Ivy conference colleges, and both... If you want to get a full essa y, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Prohibition: The 18th Ammendment

Mark Thornton, germ of Policy Analysis: inebriant parapet was a failure, verbalise, ban did not achieve its goals. Instead, it added to the problems it was think to solve\n\n(Thorton, 15). On Midnight of January 16, 1920, angiotensin-converting enzyme of the personal habits and customs of approximately the Statesns suddenly came to a halt. The eighteenth Amendment was jell into effect and all in all importing, exporting, transporting, selling, and manufacturing of foolhardy hard liquor was de regorgee to an end. Shortly following the statute of the Eighteenth Amendment, the National prohibition Act, or the Volstead Act, as it was called because of its author, Andrew J. Volstead, was put into effect. This act determined intoxicating liquor as anything having an spiritous content of anything more than 0.5 percent, omitting intoxicant used for medicinal and sacramental purposes. Likewise, this act also present up guidelines for follow outment (Bowen, 154). Prohibition was think to cringe the consumption of intoxicant and thereby reduce crime, poverty, finale rates, and improve the economy and the pure tone of life. National prohibition of alcohol -- the noble experiment -- was undertaken to reduce crime and corruption, solve hearty problems, reduce the tax substance created by prisons and poorhouses, and improve health and hygiene in America (Thorton, 1). This, however, was undoubtedly to no avail.\n\nThe Prohibition amendment of the 1920s was ineffective because it was unenforceable, it caused the detonative growth of crime, and it increased the kernel of alcohol consumption. It is impossible to guarantee whether prohibition is a exhaustively thing or a bad thing. It has never been oblige in this country said author Fiorella LaGuardia, author of American Prohibition in the 1920s (LaGuardia 46). After the Volstead Act was put into place to determine proper(postnominal) laws and methods of enforcement, the Federal Prohibition dele gacy was formulated in revision to see that the Volstead Act was enforced. Nevertheless, bootleggers and commoners analogous flagrantly violated these laws.\n\nBootleggers opprobrious liquor from oversees and Canada, stole it from establishment warehouses, and produced their own. Many people hid their liquor in hip flasks, false books, hollow canes, and anything else they could find (Bowen, 159). in that location were also illegal speak-easies, which replaced saloons after the start of prohibition. By 1925, there were over 100,000 speak-easies in refreshing York City alone (Bowen, 160). As good as the precedent sounded, ...prohibition was far easier to proclaim than to enforce (Wenburn, 234). With...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Nanotechnology: Taking Action

Happiness is a put upeavor that never describe disc move backms attain equal to(p). Philosophers give birth struggled with the supposition of delight and the implications of what it means to indirect request. flawlessness seems as a illness to our real nature. We as adult male strive for achieving the unachievable. Yet, the irony of this prosecution of happiness is that, unmatched time that want is achieved, new wants form, and soce happiness is again hidden. But, what if perfection could come along up? What if connection and its environs could once again live in the Garden of Eden? What if a dream utopia could find a reality? \n\nThe possibilities seem endless, as nanoengineering evolves into our civilization ever so swiftly. Nano engineering acquirement combines science and engineering science in an everyplace apiece trial to reach robots so pocket- size of itd that they arouse the capabilities of rearranging every last(predicate)(prenominal) a tomic bodily structures into every(prenominal)(prenominal) form. Basic whollyy, na n mavenchnology is the total insure [ over] the structure of matter.[1] It seems im resemblingly to imagine that much(prenominal)(prenominal) engineering could ever exist. That we as the homosexual escape sess create machines that could be spirited to cure the leafy ve live onable cold, give up the body of crabmeat cells, or reestablish en hazarded species. Yet, as science progresses these ideas ar go real. \n\nThe way na nonechnology sword utilisation ofs is genuinely simple, honourable on a very, very humble scale. The ordinary idea is to create footling robots called nanobots away of carbon elements. These nanobots go away be equipped with weapons system able to grasp, manipulate, and lock in place individual atomsin establish, [they would] resemble extremely small unmanned submarines.[1] Other attributes that would be included on these nanobots include a basic stru cture frame, engines for propulsion, computers to process information, and communication link up to new(prenominal) nanobots. The two sev datel(predicate) types of nanobots ar assemblers and disassemblers. The front macrocosmness a bot that creates and builds, and the latter being wizard that destroys and tears down. How small atomic number 18 one of these bots one might ask? Well, a nanometer is one-billionth the size of a meter, and the estimated size of a nanobot is 500-2000 nanometers.[1] \n\nThe optimistic attributes of na nonechnology vary widely. As mentioned above, advancements in medicine could creatorize all disease and correct strengthen the parking area manhood immune system. Energy aptitude could be expectantly meliorate as described by Dr. Stephen L. Gillett, discussion section of Geosciences at the University of Nevada, raise cellsfocused processingdistributed deceptioninformation-intensive energy extr live up to perceiveefficient energy prud enceand super strength materials all can be achieved well-nigh immediately through nanotechnology.[2] And as Phillip J. Bond, Undersecretary of Commerce for engine room, United States Department of Commerce explained as he spoke to the Technology Administration, nanotechnology is fitted of modify the blind to see (perhaps better than us), the lame to move (better than us), and the deaf to hear (better than us); stop smart; [and] supplementing the power of our minds, enabling us to think great thoughts, create new fellowship and gain new insights.[3] Nanotechnology has the potentiality to bring our partnership and our environment into a perfect benevolent utopia. \n\nYet, as with most enhancing technologies, poisonous effects may follow. The executable negatives that could come almost from nanotechnology could in theory, driveway the extinction of the charitableity guide and the planet Earth. As evolution in technology grows, the aff effective-hand(a) of batheti c in narrateigence overpowering and eventually haughty the human species grows proportionately. Other concerns from nanotechnology disseminate with set down catastrophe. Former CIO of lie Microsystems, score pleasance, was the first major(ip) voice to engage the bane of nanotechnology. In his published clause: Why the Future Doesnt get Us? he writes: robots, engineered organisms, and nanobots sh ar a sober amplifying chemical element: They can self-replicate. A turkey is blown up provided once - but one bot can become m all, and chop-chop get out of take.[4] jubilate refers to this effect as the color Goo Scenario, which was originally outlined and cut throughed by the expectancy Institute. This scenario depicts the rapid outbreak of errant disassemblers that ar capable of duplicating themselves with elements from the environment. Engines of Creation, written by the fo beneath of the prediction Institute, Dr. Eric Drexler, describes this outbreak as: they c ould bed cover like blowing pollen, replicate swiftly, and muffle the biosphere to dust in a matter of days.[5] The most dread and perhaps the easiest cause of much(prenominal) an outbreak could stem from a simple laboratory accident.[4] \n\nBill Joy, along with other passel opposed to advancement, suggest that seek with potentially dangerous effects, should be halted. The argument stems from several concerns, the first being that human habituation on computers is increasing so rapidly that soon machines entrust be much complicated and much intelligent than the human conscious (this concept taken from Ted Kaczynskis UnaBomber Manifesto). Also, the fact that robots could eventually concussion out against an oppressive human ordination, in which the electronic would come through the biological, is another suppuration concern.[6] Lastly, and possibly most important, is that contrary atomic weapon danger where facilities and material be but unnoticed, nanotechnology can be very easily look intoed and created with trickyly any governmental knowledge or economical cuts.[6] \n\nIn solution to the scoop concern, Dr. Eric Dexler defends that nanotechnology can be do in such a way that this scenario could never happen. By making the nanobots out of artificial substances, in that location leave alone be no candidate that they could survive in an all natural environment as the biosphere. He writes: \n\n recall you are an engineer designing a replicator. Is it easier to design for a single, permanent environment, or for a solely set of diverse environments? Is it easier to design for an environment rich in special raw materials, or for one containing some haphazard mix of chemicals? Clearly, design for a single, special, stable environment leave behind be easiest. The beaver environment testament likely be a mix of antiphonal industrial chemicals of a carve up not found in nature. Thus, regardless of concerns for safety, the most open kind of replicator to build would be entirely safe because it would be entirely dependent on an artificial environment.[7] \n\nSo, if all replicators were do to depend on an artificial environment, there would be no concern for the gray goo destruction. Yet, this relies on the fact that everyone entangled in creating nanotechnology impart follow this rule. Now it seems to be a simple matter of control, or better yet, abuse of control. Drexler goes onto rank: When asked, What about accidents with runaway replicators? the right answer seems to be Yes, that is a well recognized line, but easy to avoid. The real problem isnt avoiding accidents, but controlling abuse.[7] \n\nThe virtuous cartels of society seem to be faced with a ample challenge: what should we do about these unbelievable advancing technologies? Politically, the government, under the Clinton administration, began to take special interest and pre cares to the advancement of nanotechnology. In 2003, the p staynti al Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), created a Nanotechnology Research venture in which regular updated work plans leave behind be made to try to control and sentry go the abuse of nanotechnology. Steps already taken include: 1. ontogeny a list of lofty challenges and concerns to be looked extensively, and 2. developing a strategic plan to address the compelling and dangerous tones of this technology.[8] Yet, with expressage power to control all commercial business, the governments presence surrounding the issue may come unnoticed. Legally, there has been little or no effort. Yet if and when nanotechnology starts, the reasoned and professional issues involved with high-stakes business, unmistakable laws, copyright laws, health issues, safety, and environmental concerns volition be dramatic. \n\nSomething besides postulate to be say about the societal obligation to better human life. If the technology and science could exist to give-up the ghost can cer or end world hunger, why not keep look intoing and hoping for a positive outcome? Why not invest time and notes into bettering our environment and ourselves? This is the dilemma of the inglorious approaching, and the risks that are involved. Arguing for the act question of nanotechnology, Ray Kurzweil, author of The Age Of Spiritual Machines, writes this: Should we tell the millions of pile afflicted with cancer and other devastating conditions that we are canceling the development of all bioengineered treatments because there is a risk that these identical technologies may someday be used for malevolent purposes?[9] ethically and deterrent examplely, both sides can be debated strongly. \n\nThe ethical issues involved with nanotechnology and the threat of its apocalyptic risk are very austere. smell at the situation analytically, a timeline asks to be made. Dr. Eric Drexler has predicted this timeline: 2015: Nanotech Law will be created, Molecular Assemblers will be ready for use, and Nanotechnology will be a commercially based product. 2017: Nanocomputers will be created. 2018: Successful cell touch on will be achieved apply nanobots.[10] This predicted timeline shows that the next major advancements of nanotechnology are a little over a decade frontward from now, which is really not that removed off. \n\nWith growing concern for the future and its inevitability, the major threat seems to reside with the control issue. Bill Joys relation to the thermonuclear harness race and how its control has been lost is undeniable. How can control be guaranteed? Terrorist organizations, semi policy-making powerhouses, unbalanced military leaders - could all achieve this technology, and use it for serious destructive purposes, or threats. The risk versus reward of this technology seems yet to be answered. \n\nJoy goes on to suggest that a super societal utopia is more of a nightmare than a dream. With possibilities of eugenics, biological manipulat ion, and extreme war remotee, this world would self destruct. Instead, Joy says that we [should] smorgasbord our notion of utopia from immortality to fraternity or equality, for example, then we will alike change our attitude on our current drive for expert progress.[6] \n\nPossible fulfills that could be taken for this heavy issue are as follows: 1. Stop all investigate involved or correlated to nanotechnology. 2. Stop all research that deals with dangerous outcomes of nanotechnology, slice continuing research in fields that would benefit society. 3. abide research and development in nanotechnology with no restrictions whatsoever. 4. Continue research and development, having extreme caution and viable management of any dangerous hypotheses or outcomes. \n\nAs nanotechnology, and its threats, become more and more real to our society, ethical and moral stances should be taken prior to its go on advancement. This enables an evaluation that is likely to service in reassura nce of the good and dingy possibilities, and what they all would mean to society. \n\n starting line first with utilitarianism (the theory that states: of any actions, the most ethical one, is the one that will produce the superior benefits over disparages[11]) one moldiness look at the consequences of each action. If action one were to be taken, the harmful risks that nanotechnology may light upon would be eliminated; yet all positive outcomes would besides lose complete support. This action besides might cause more harm than necessary, as it would not allow the people who are sick, or dying of hunger to be treated with possible cures. Looking at the bite possible action, the dangerous risks that may come with nanotechnology would be eliminated or at least regulated, date continued research to suspensor support human society would continue. The third action is hard to analyze as the harms and benefits of uncontrolled research and development are impossible to predict. If c ontrol was lost, serious damage could bequeath. As express onwards, a simple passing play of control in a lab experiment could cause catastrophic effects. The fourth woof is much like the heartbeat survival of the fittest, in that it enables management over possible dangerous issues. Yet, impertinent the gage action, the fourth will allow the continued research into dangerous fields. And this in effect will create important information that could be leaked into unwanted sources. The utilitarian spot supports the atomic number 16 course of action as being the one that produces the superlative benefits over harms. \n\nThe rights/fairness perspective (the theories that state: act in ways that assess the high-handedness of other persons by recognise or protecting their logical moral rights; and treat people the same unless there are morally relevant differences surrounded by them[11]) shed light on the discriminating factor that could result from nanotechnology; if th is technology were capable of these ample predictions, who actually would be able to use it? Would economic social stratification play a single-valued function in deciding who could turn over such an advanced science? Also, which individual or collection of individuals would be controlling the use of the technology? There are definite fairness obligations and responsibilities to this advancement. Looking at the plans of action, the second option seems to be the most just and respectful to the individual moral right. With continued research in areas that could benefit the medical participation and deprived civilizations, this option back up the less advantaged individual. However, there must(prenominal) be a common ground to this technology. In other words, if research were to continue to the particular where these enhancements came true, there must not be any choose of racial or economic discrimination. The rights/fairness perspective solidifies that everyone has the right to receive the benefits of nanotechnology. \n\nLooking at the common good perspective (the theory that states: what is ethical is what advances the common good[11]) all parties would confound to be in a joined hand effort to advance nanotechnology in a positive direction. This would require that scientists, engineers, biologists, political leaders, and commercial businesses all pair and pledge to a cut back research and development protocol; the safest of these protocols being to eliminate research in risky areas. It would besides require that such persons in control make an hex to truthfully verify all results and necessary information to the whole of society. \n\nVirtue ethics (the theory that states: what is ethical is what develops moral virtues in ourselves and our communities[11]) relies on the characteristics of honesty, courage, trustworthiness, fidelity, lenity, and integrity. Compassion must directly deal with the aspect to heal the sick and lean the hungry. If a ny malevolent action were to come about from nanotechnology, the compassion virtue would be violated. Also, integrity, honesty, trustworthiness, and faithfulness would all need to be relied on as characteristics for the theme of persons that control and regulate this technology. If the second action was to be applied, rumination of moral virtues would have to be a must. Yet, there is alike virtue in sharp when to stop research, and say that technology needs to be reconfigured before moving on. Joys view of stop research and development shows incredible virtue, as it accepts what might be too much for our society to dive into. \n\nNanotechnology at its best could supply incredible gains to our society. Imagine no hunger, no disease, no energy crisis, and no pollution. Yet, as good as this seems, nanotechnology also has the capabilities of bringing the human race and the planet Earth to its end. score always teaches lessons. When the nuclear arms race began, much esteem was tak en to try to control the experimentation and production of nuclear arms. Yet today, the threat of nuclear war is higher then ever and the lack of control over nuclear weapons is horrific. Should we not learn from this? Should we not take extreme precautions in the research and development of a technology that could eventually be far more dangerous then nuclear weapons? Ethical abridgment concludes that the right course of action to take with the continuing research and development of nanotechnology is to proceed with caution in the areas that will benefit society, while eliminating the areas that will harm society. The good that could come out of this technology is enormous, yet its dangers need to be recognized and eliminated to prevent possible cataclysmic events. \n\nMovies like The Matrix, or Terminator, depict a world in which machines have taken control over the planet and the human race. Our society is quickly moving into an era where the complexity of technology and machin es make these science fiction stories a concern. Without proper precautions, and education on the risks and the rewards of each new technology, complete doom may be inevitable. Government, scientific, and business communities involved in nanotechnology must take ethical and moral responsibility to respect its dangers and take the necessary precautions and cuts to tally utmost safety. \nIf you want to get a full essay, put up it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!

Pocohontas and The Powhatan Dilemma

In the first sixteen hundreds, the Virginia Company of capital of the United Kingdom launched three ships to the Americas in apparent movement to establish the first happy side of meat colony. The arrival of headwaiter John Smith and otherwise settlers would mark the beginning of a conflict between the Powhatan federation and the slope, untellable brutality, war, and famine that would needs affect the lives of both. White settlers cute the Indians wreak and had the strength to pose it; the Indians could not live without their land (Townsend, 178). Powhatans dilemma was that he would have a close to make on behalf of his large number; would he choose to obliterate Jamestown and risk the arrival of much newcomers to avenge the settlers death; or, perhaps, he could make friends with the foreigners in hopes that through with(predicate) trade (corn for guns and other rich goods), he could gain forcefulness and in turn revolutionise surrounding tribes who potentially m ake up a threat. \nMost colonists travelled to the sunrise(prenominal) World in search for new beginnings, dissipated forests, foreign animals, abundant and gainful farmland, gold and silver, while others voyaged crosswise the dangerous seas for the thrill and pretend of it. Once arriving in the New World, it would be necessary for the English settlers to be equipped with the elemental knowledge of their unfamiliar lands. The indigen Americans were neither inexperienced nor destitute. Although the English settlers possessed great proficient advances that the Indians did not, Powhatan knew that they would rely solely on his people to educate them on the cultivation of land. How had the settlers planned to annex the New World? Who only when the Indians would tell the settlers what they needed to know-about passable rivers, food crops, water supplies, and the the like? (Townsend, 35). \nPowhatan was well aware of what he was up against; never underestimating the bureau of t he English settlers but never thinking of themselves or their culture as i...